What do you call a gathering of parish councillors? A tribe? A murmuration?
(A wrangle? A mutter? A grievance? – Ed)
Whatever we are called, I always welcome the opportunity to meet up with fellow councillors – it’s a great way to share ideas and to swap experiences (usually of dealing with the scourge of developers and a multitude of potholes). It was at one of these recent gatherings that Dorset Council shared its latest thoughts on planning.
The big news was, of course. that the Planning and Infrastructure Act received Royal Assent in December. This is the wildly ambitious plan to Get Britain Building – to create 1.5 million new homes. As a consequence, most towns and villages are now being bombarded with planning applications – and the character of some places is being changed forever.
While it’s important that the housing crisis is addressed, I have to wonder whether the homes we need – as opposed to the luxury homes beloved by developers that no local person can afford – are actually being built.
Naturally, with Dorset currently unable to meet the five-year housing supply target, planning application numbers have increased. Now, and each year, 3,246 homes must be built in the county. That does not include the Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch area, where there are additional targets.
In practical terms, that means many existing Neighbourhood Plans – drawn up by town and parish councils to shape where and how development happens in their areas – will now be out of date. The mood in the room was interesting at this stage, almost like a mad pass-the-hot-potato game with no one wanting a large development on their own patch. Some council chairmen are clearly under siege from major developers. The usually smug ones from the AONB villages were not looking so smug as they swiftly realised that nothing in Dorset is sacred any longer. Will we see houses on Hambledon Hill or Bulbarrow? I think not … but it increasingly feels as though no meadow is safe. And as for North Dorchester and its abundance of water, the recent flooding should have sent a very clear message to planners – but it won’t have.
And if it’s not housing on that meadow everyone loves, it may yet become a field of solar panels.
You will be overridden
Many parishes and towns have spent hours drawing up their Neighbourhood Plans. Designed to allow a certain amount of development and have a settlement boundary, they have always taken hours of unpaid work and, in many cases, high consultancy fees. It’s always good to have a strategic way forward and some of these plans have been agreed by local referendum. However, as the good people of Pimperne know, a Neighbourhood Plan is not worth much when it comes to the council’s decision-making process. I’m currently wondering if we should even bother to spend money on our own parish Neighbourhood Plan if it is simply going to be overridden when housing targets loom.
The answer to this dilemma came with the decision-making processes for agreeing developments. As the Neighbourhood Plans are out of date, the policies in the Dorset Local Plan will take precedence.
This also means that if a local Neighbourhood Plan says something that does not accord with the Dorset Local Plan, the latter takes precedence. In other words, all that local knowledge will be disregarded – you need to say the right things, speak the mantra and align with the planners, or risk being overridden.
Hopefully some Neighbourhood Plan thinking can be included in the Dorset Local Plan (LP). While another iteration of the Dorset LP is expected in August, at this stage it feels less like a consultation and more like a done deal at this stage. Developers are actively submitting plans regardless of any public consultation.
Why bother?
All of this is very difficult.
As a parish councillor, I’m left having to explain to people why our opinions count for nothing.
And why productive fields are being lost when national food security is a live concern.
People are asking why some new homes that are said to be ‘desperately needed’ remain unsold locally. Why build more?
They are asking why promised social housing has not been prioritised by developers, when that is the exact housing needed to stem the accommodation crisis.
And local people are demanding answers about drainage and flood protection – none of which is solved by developers as if they were a silver bullet.
However, what frustrates people the most is that so many have contributed productive ideas to these Neighbourhood Plans: plans which do include more housing as there is a recognition that additional homes are needed.
To see these careful plans overridden, hours of unpaid work brushed aside and hard-won local knowledge dismissed is not only deeply disappointing, it sends a clear message to volunteers: why bother?
This is not a NIMBY moan. It is a serious question. Does any parish or town council truly have a voice any more? Or are we expected to sit down, shut up and allow developers to concrete over whichever part of the countryside is next? The voters deserve better.
***The Dorset Insider is a no-holds-barred column pulling back the curtain on local affairs with insight, honesty and the occasional raised eyebrow. Written by a seasoned parish councillor who prefers to remain anonymous (for obvious reasons), it cuts through the noise to expose the frustrations of grassroots politics, and say what others won’t. Rest assured, their identity is known – and trusted – by the editorial team. Expect opinion, candour … and a healthy dose of exasperation:***



















