Yeovil town council steps up with tax increase to safeguard beloved recreation ground amidst Somerset’s budget cuts

There is some good news from Yeovil on the future of the town’s valued and much-used recreation ground, which was threatened with closure as part of Somerset Council’s draconian cuts – part of a nationwide picture of underfunded rural councils facing financial melt-down.
Yeovil Town Council, which has unanimously decided to increase Council Tax for the upcoming fiscal year, agreed budget plans aimed at preserving the athletics arena. This move is part of a strategy to allocate resources for the upkeep and operational expenses associated with Yeovil Recreation Centre.
Andy Kendall, the town council Liberal Democrat leader, says it is the first step towards saving the facilities, but there are still months of negotiations ahead with Somerset Council.
Somerset Council currently faces a £100 million funding deficit and consequently has some hard choices to make – but the threat to Yeovil’s important leisure facility inspired a huge campaign by users, including a petition which has already attracted more than 14,000 signatures.
Geoff Cole, chairman of Yeovil Olympiads Athletics Club (AC), says: ‘The athletics arena is used by the Yeovil Olympiads AC, Dorchester AC, Yeovil Town Road Running Club and Running for Time Running club. In addition to those clubs, more than a dozen local schools and colleges used the athletics track in 2023, from all over South Somerset and North Dorset. There is no other facility like it locally.’
Closing the arena could mean the end of schools and club competitions, ‘and Somerset County Athletics Championships could not be held in Somerset,’ he said.
There is similar strong support from other users, including Jo Stephenson of Yeovil and Sherborne Hockey Club. The construction of the artificial pitch in 2013 was a collaborative venture between South Somerset District Council, the Hockey Club and England Hockey, and the club continues to invest in the facility. It has just made a contribution of £10,000 towards the provision of equipment so the café can provide players with meals and bring more income to the Rec. She said it would be ‘devastating’ if the facilities the club had worked hard to establish were lost – ‘Once gone they will be gone for good,’ she warned. ‘It would be another nail in the coffin of this area of South Somerset, which is recognised as one of the most deprived areas in the South West.’
A spokesperson for Somerset Council said the council both owns and operates Yeovil Recreation Ground: ‘Therefore, it is not “funded” as such, in the way that we grant-fund some other leisure centres, which are operated on a contractor basis. The annual operating cost for Yeovil Recreation Ground is c£190,000 net.’

As local towns fight to save their sports facilities, Rachael Rowe highlights the clash between budget cuts and public health priorities

What do you do when a sports centre or recreation ground that plays a critical part in the community’s health and wellbeing is at risk of closure?
With limits on the public monies available, local authorities have to make difficult spending decisions. Cutting sports and leisure funding seems inevitable. How can recreational facilities be protected, maintained and become sustainable, when closing them seems to fly in the face of the council policy of keeping people healthy?

QE Leisure Centre, Wimborne
In March 2022, Dorset Council Cabinet agreed to serve a two year notice period on the QE Leisure Centre. Local authorities are responsible for ensuring they get best value for money within their limited budgets, and their contribution to the leisure centre in Wimborne is £550,000 annually – a third of Dorset’s entire leisure budget.
From April this year, the management of the leisure centre will be handed to the Queen Elizabeth School and the general public, apart from those in clubs with prior arrangements, will no longer be able to use the facilities.
In 2021, 64 per cent of the 1,799 respondents to a public consultation said they used the facilities. A petition was launched as soon as local residents heard news of the closure. Stuart Paterson, from the group QE Leisure Centre Action, which is working on the response, described the initial reaction to the news in 2022: ‘At the time, although the clubs were happy to discuss the issue, there was a bit of reluctance to do anything because there was a widespread view that alternative arrangements would be made.
‘It’s a very popular centre and there is a lot of support for it. It looks like that’s the end of the public facility, so it will have a big impact on the community. We have a 25 metre pool that’s deep enough for scuba diving clubs to use. There are daily hydrotherapy sessions, which people are referred to for medical reasons. The prospect of that closing is a major issue. And the Wimborne Wagtails is a disability swimming group which uses the pool. Some don’t have their own transport and public transport often doesn’t tie in with the timing of sessions.
‘Although the council is quick to point out that there are three other council-run leisure centres within a 20 minute drive of Wimborne, it’s not like-for-like. Some centres don’t have the facilities that we have.’
Initio Learning Trust, which runs the school says:
‘We understand the concerns expressed by users of the QE Leisure Centre and swimming pool after the council’s decision to withdraw from running the facility from 31st March. The pool requires improvements, and in order for those to be carried out it will have to be closed for a period. It will therefore be unavailable for use from 1st April 2024. We anticipate the works will be completed in time for the new school year in September this year, which is when we expect school lessons to restart. From that point the pool may also be hired to swimming lesson providers, clubs and community groups, but we do not intend to directly provide lessons or general public swimming.’

Sturfit
Much like the QE Centre in Wimborne, Sturminster Newton Leisure Centre’s purpose was always to provide a sports facility for the high school as well as the local community – the land for the building was provided by the Pitt-Rivers Estate with a covenant on it to that end.
When it was at similar risk of closure due to lack of funds in 2011, an open Sturminster Newton Town Council meeting was held to find a solution. During the meeting, it was proposed that a charitable trust might take over the running of the centre as a not-for-profit organisation, and various local residents volunteered to be the trustees of the newly-formed Sturfit charity.
Sturminster Newton High School recently joined the Sherborne Area Schools Trust (SAST) and Sturfit and SAST have continued an already excellent working relationship. The leisure centre is used by several thousand people each week.
Chairman of Sturfit, Courtenay Hitchcock says: ‘During term times, Sturfit has full use of the gym and dance studio, and the school has priority use of the main hall. We manage the facility on behalf of SAST and they are responsible for the fabric of the building. We employ a full time manager, other staff are subcontracted, and we also support the numerous local small businesses who run the various classes and clubs here.
‘One of the challenges we face is the common misunderstanding that we are funded and run by the council – we’re not, and haven’t been since 2012! But the model we have is working well for all parties. Sitting down together and working out what works for everyone was key.’
The Sturfit trustees have had to work through lots of important lessons, and their experience could perhaps help those places that are now at risk of closure. Courtenay added: ‘Leisure facilities are in a difficult situation right now when running either as a for-profit private enterprise or, especially, as a cash-strapped council-funded facility. Our model is a really good solution for us and for the school.
‘From the outside, I can’t see why it wouldn’t work for Wimborne too. If there is a core of people with the will and momentum to change to a charitable model, it’s a viable option that can also open up further opportunities in terms of grant funding.’

• To support the QE leisure Centre Action petition, sign here.

Blackmore & Sparkford Vale Hunt suspended after drone footage shows a fox being killed, sparking investigation and debate on hunting practices

The Blackmore & Sparkford Vale Hunt has been suspended by its governing body after the release of drone footage which shows a pack of hounds killing a fox.
The footage, captured by North Dorset Hunt Saboteurs, was taken on 4th December and released to the hunt’s governing body, the British Hound Sporting Association (BHSA), and Channel 4 News last Thursday (25th January) – Click play on the video below to watch the full news report.
Before the footage was released to the public, the BHSA had announced its decision to suspend the hunt group. The Association’s statement says:
‘The BHSA are aware of the content of footage taken on 4th December. As a consequence, the Blackmore & Sparkford Vale Hunt and all BHSA members within the hunt were suspended from all hunting activities on the 24th January pending further investigation.
‘The incident has been referred to the Hound Sports Regulatory Authority who will open a disciplinary inquiry.’
One of the North Dorset Sabs, who was in attendance when the drone footage was taken, told the BV:
‘Although we are very pleased with the suspension and police investigation, we had really hoped that the presence of the drone would have stopped the hunt killing the fox.
‘Unfortunately, it seemed they were making so much noise and were so engrossed in chasing the fox that they didn’t notice it until it was too late. It’s a sickening insight into what goes on and very upsetting for us all that we couldn’t save this fox.’

First hand experience
Since the 2004 Hunting Act, it has been illegal to knowingly chase live animals with dogs; guilty parties found breaking this law can be issued a £5,000 fine. The BV contacted Dorset’s Police and Crime Commissioner, David Sidwick for comment on the case but were told that he ‘would not make comment on what is a current and ongoing police investigation.’
A report released last year by the League Against Cruel Sports collated ’621 cases of hunt havoc and 361 incidents of hunts being involved in suspected illegal hunting’. It found that the Blackmore & Sparkford Vale Hunt was the second-worst offending hunt in the country, with the South Dorset Hunt being the worst.
(Although the League Against Cruel Sports is an independent charity, its data is collated by the public and saboteurs, and results could be exaggerated or even falsified.)
However, The BV has spoken with one Sturminster Newton farmer who has first-hand experience of the Blackmore & Sparkford Vale Hunt trespassing on his land and worrying his animals over many years.
Terence Fox had previously allowed the hunt to pass through his land until an incident in 1996. He said: ‘They [the hunt] stampeded our entire herd of dairy cattle across a narrow bridge and up to the farm, half a kilometre. These [were] pregnant animals, and animals in milk – our livelihood.
‘They were half a mile away and I called them back. The men came back and they surrounded me on horseback. It felt threatening.
‘That was really the beginning of the end.’

Since that moment, the 60-year-old farmer says that the hunt has been ‘antagonistic and destructive’ towards both himself and his farm. ‘We were advised to put a number of cameras around because of their behaviour, which we’ve now done.’
Mr Fox prides himself on the biodiversity of his farm. He added: ‘It’s very distressing, when you have a wildlife-friendly farm, to have a whole pack of hounds killing.’
He went on to explain how a wild animal was killed during a period of two hours the hunt spent on his land:
‘We heard it die that day. It screamed like a baby.’
After seeing the North Dorset Sab’s drone footage of the incident for which the Blackmore & Sparkford Vale Hunt has been suspended, Mr Fox said that it was, in his opinion, ‘appalling’.
He added: ‘I hope they get brought to book for it. And it’s about time these people were brought into line.
‘The Hunting Act might be ambiguous, but threatening behaviour, anti-social behaviour, aggravated trespass, criminal damage and killing wildlife with dogs are all illegal – and they’re not in the least ambiguous.’

A critical moment
The BV has approached the Blackmore & Sparkford Vale Hunt and various members for comment, but they have been advised not to comment during the ongoing investigation.
One organisation that did speak to The BV was the Countryside Alliance, which works alongside hunts and the BHSA as an external public relations firm.
A spokesperson for the Alliance said that ‘there have been just a handful of hunts prosecuted since the Hunting Act came into force almost 19 years ago’. They added: ‘It is estimated that around 12,000 days of lawful hunting activities take place across the country each season … demonstrating that the majority of hunting days are conducted within the law.’
Hunts are lawfully allowed to go out on what are known as trail hunts. This is the practice of using a pack of hounds to follow a scent of animal urine, typically fox, that is laid in advance – the trail.
‘If hounds accidentally deviate from the trail that has been laid for them and start following the scent of a live quarry, it is the responsibility of the huntsman and hunt staff (those assisting the huntsman), to stop the hounds immediately.’
The Alliance stressed that the General Election due to take place this year marks a dangerous time for the future of hunting. They said: ’There is political change in the air and Labour are currently hot favourites to win.
‘This represents a critical moment for hunting. So now, more than ever, it is crucial that hunts are able to openly demonstrate that their lawful hunting activities are legitimate and that they are operating to the highest standards at all times.
‘Throughout the festive period there was incredible coverage nationwide … as ever with the media, however, bad news always spreads faster than good news.’

Rural livelihoods
When the 2004 Hunting Act came into force, hunts moved over to trail hunting to ensure that hunts such as the Blackmore & Sparkford Vale could continue. The Alliance says that ’the trail hunting community across Dorset and beyond is still thriving.
‘Trail hunting has enabled hunts that were impacted by the Hunting Act to adapt their practices while still retaining their infrastructure, ensuring a future for their hounds and horses as well as careers for the hunt staff. The continuation of trail hunting also ensures that other, related, businesses – such as farriers, horse breeders, feed merchants and horsebox manufacturers – will still benefit too.
‘Trail hunting plays an important role within communities, bringing together people from all walks of life and of all ages who enjoy following hounds. Whether following on horse or on foot, hunt supporters benefit widely from the positive physical and mental well-being that hunting generates. Social interaction plays a key role too, particularly for those who are from isolated or remote rural areas.’